Logo-bi
Bioimpacts. 2012;2(1): 33-37.
doi: 10.5681/bi.2012.004
PMID: 23678439
PMCID: PMC3648918
Scopus ID: 84876795909
  Abstract View: 1934
  PDF Download: 986

Original Research

Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Contaminated Traumatic Wounds: Two Days versus Five Days Treatment

Hamed-Basir Ghafouri 1, Barzin Bagheri-Behzad 2, Mohammad-Reza Yasinzadeh 2, Ehsan Modirian 2, Dorsa Divsalar 3, Shervin Farahmand 4*

1 Emergency Department, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Emergency Department, Rasul-Akram Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Debrecen Medical University and Health Center, Debrecen, Hungary
4 Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: shfarahmand@tums.ac.ir

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department manages several kinds of wounds including simple, non-bite traumatic wounds and lacerations. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is one of prescribed treatment in these conditions. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of the two day regimen of prophylactic antimicrobial agents with the five day regimen in simple traumatic but highly contaminated wounds. Methods: Between January 2010 and May 2010, patients presenting with simple traumatic wounds or lacerations in different parts of the body, highly contaminated with soil, debris or feces in emergency department of a referral educational hospital in Tehran (Rasul-Akram hospital), Iran, went for primary closure. All of the patients were provided prophylactic antibiotic, however, prescribed for one group (A) of patients for 2 days and other group (B) received for 5 days, according to the physician concerned. As these treatments were routine, we selected 70 patients from each group using table of random numbers. The patients were warned about the signs of infection including long-lasting erythema, purulent discharge and inflammation and were supposed to inform the concerned physician in any of such alarming situations. Oral Cephalexin 500 mg qid was prescribed for all patients enrolled for prophylaxis treatment. Results: On follow-up 11 (8.2%) patients were found to develop sutured site infection (6 out of 70 (8.57%) in group A, and five out of 70 (7.14%) in group B (P=0.31)). There was no statistical difference between infection rates between men (8.6%) in comparison to women (6.25%) (P>0.05; CI=95%). Conclusion: Our study showed that 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy using Cephalexin is at least as effective as a 5-day regimen in relation to development of surgical site infection in patients with simple traumatic contaminated wounds or lacerations.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1935

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 986

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 11 Dec 2011
Revision: 02 Feb 2012
Accepted: 12 Mar 2012
ePublished: 17 Mar 2012
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)