<script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-48293608-1'); </script>
Logo-bi
Bioimpacts. 2026;16: 32751.
doi: 10.34172/bi.32751
  Abstract View: 40
  PDF Download: 73

Review

Three-dimensional bioprinted hydrogels for the management of diabetic wounds: A review

Piyali Khamkat 1 ORCID logo, Bramhajit Chatterjee 1, Sourav Ghosh 2, Bhupendra Prajapati 3, Biswajit Basu 2*, Sudarshan SIngh 4,5* ORCID logo

1 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Brainware University, 398, Ramkrishnapur Road, Barasat, Kolkata 700125, India
2 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Health & Medical Sciences, Adamas University, Barasat, Kolkata, West Bengal 700126, India
3 Department of Pharmaceutics, Parul Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Parul University, Waghodia, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India
4 Office of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
5 Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
*Corresponding Authors: Biswajit Basu, Email: bbasu.pharma@gmail.com; Sudarshan Singh, Email: sudarshansingh83@hotmail.com

Abstract

Globally, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), a chronic metabolic disease, is at its peak. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is more common worldwide, which raises the risk of ulcers and chronic healing, or non-healing wounds. Overall 15% to 20% of people with diabetes develop diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), which is a significant consequence. Managing and treatment of wounds require an advancement of novel healing therapies with the use of biological dressings. The development of DFU wound dressings and the biomanufacturing of composite 3D skin substitutes are examples of 3D bioprinting technology for enhancing therapeutic approaches. These approaches and challenges of bioprinting technology in wound healing of chronic DFUs are covered in this review. Moreover, the review highlights the selection of biomaterials, integration of biomimetic approaches, and the ability of 3D bioprinting to replicate native skin architecture. Despite significant advances, the review identifies critical gaps including limited vascularization in printed constructs, standardization issues, and scalability challenges that impede clinical translation. Emerging biotechnological tools and novel biomaterial developments are also discussed, emphasizing their potential to overcome these limitations and improve DFU wound management.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 24

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 73

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 30 Aug 2025
Revision: 12 Nov 2025
Accepted: 18 Nov 2025
ePublished: 24 Feb 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)